Plasma Mail News

Posts Tagged ‘answer’

I wan to contact the persons who give the answers to my questions. As I don’t see their email or any other way to contact them, Can anybody tell me How to contact them?

You said in the email “You have an answer.” I go to my account page and it states “No answer yet.” Why is this? Did your operations guys drink too much last night?

Choose a best answer q

customer tur…
1 week ago

6 day(s) left to answer.
was the 11th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, UN-Constitutionally adopted?
Was the Amendment UN-Constitutional because it was not in Pursuance of the Original Constitution?

Additional Details

Dec 24, 2005 at 10:07 am
In Pursiance thereof; I bealieve, means not to revise any part of the ORIGINAL

Dec 31, 2005 at 8:25 am
I will withhold this deputy clerk’s name, but in the federal courts today, some clerks and yes even in the United States Supreme Court, the deputy clerk uses the 11th Amendment, and even though the Amendment does not state this, the clerk states that an individual can not sue thier own state, this statement is fact. Just imagine, that the hard core confederates, thought if and when the slaves are freed, they will be able to sue us for the past treatment. The Founding Fathers correctly framed the Original Constitution. We would not have all this corruption in our government, if the this Amendment was decided to be UN-Constitutional so that the court clerks that use the law to abridge the people’s rights could no longer do this. The Founding Fathers with the Original Constitution knew correctly that when the 1st Amendment is correctly followed in realation to the states, that “only honorable” persons would then be placed in the position of all our government.

You can’t answer your own question.

Email Question | Add Details | Call a Vote | Extend Expiration | Delete Question

Answers

Orbus
1 week ago

Report Abuse
I don’t believe failure to be “in pursuance of the original constitution” can render an amendment unconstitutional.

Amendments serve to permit the constitution to be modified – not just the wording, but the spirit. That’s why there’s such a large consensus required to ratify an amendment – there is no provision to restrict what an amendment can do.

This is perfectly intentional – the good judgement of the citizens of the United States should make it hard to pass an amendment, and the constitutional authors didn’t believe their own judgment to be superior, for all time, than the judgment of the people living in that time.

So, to answer your question fully, not being in pursuance of the original constitution is in no way a detriment for an amendment – in fact, any amendment that’s solely in pursuance of the original constitution is probably unneccessary.

Edit:
In light of your revision, Asker, I belive that you disagree with all major constitutional scholars on the meaning of “in Pursuance thereof.” I haven’t encountered a view elsewhere that claims the Constitution as written was intended to be impossible to change, even in spirit. On the contrary, one of the often-referenced strengths of the document is that it makes radical change possible – even to itself – without reqiring that the govenment be overthrown by force.

While I can see where your interpretation comes from, I believe you’ve made an error, elevating the original state of the constitution above the process it provides for its own amendment.

jamesmusik84
1 week ago

Report Abuse
The constitution specifically says, “The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.”

They clearly anticipated these amendments modifying the original document. In fact, many of the amendments have revised the original. Changing the election of Senators and Representatives to popular election, changing the way the number of representatives was calculated, changing the day Congress convenes, and allowing income tax are just a few of the major revisions to the original that have come about by the amendments.

Source(s):

http://www.archives.gov/national-archive…

tatonka
11 hours ago

Report Abuse
If it was ratified then no. I have heard similar complaints of the 14th-16th because the Confederacy was forced to adopt this amendments to rejoin the Union

i forgot my password to my email and i can not remember my security question answer what do i need to do?

I clean, do laundry, answer email, play games with my daughter like operation, scattergories etc…or we like to play with our dogs. What do you like to do?

there are sooooo many questions that have sat for days with no best answer voted on. And after calling for a vote, does the best answer get awarded after so many days of voting?

www.roboform.com – Your email account needs to be even more secure than your game account. Your email is the root of all accesses. Protect yourself by having different passwords for every site, email, game etc.